Inspecting posteriors

library(CausalQueries)
library(knitr)
library(ggplot2)
library(rstan)
library(bayesplot)
rstan_options(refresh = 0)

Accessing the posterior

When you update a model using CausalQueries, CausalQueries generates and updates a stan model and saves the posterior distribution over parameters in the model.

The basic usage is:

data <- data.frame(X = rep(c(0:1), 10), Y = rep(c(0:1), 10))

model <- make_model("X -> Y") |>
  update_model(data)

The posterior over parameters can be accessed thus:

inspect(model, "posterior_distribution")
#> 
#> posterior_distribution
#> Summary statistics of model parameters posterior distributions:
#> 
#>   Distributions matrix dimensions are 
#>   4000 rows (draws) by 6 cols (parameters)
#> 
#>      mean   sd
#> X.0  0.50 0.10
#> X.1  0.50 0.10
#> Y.00 0.08 0.07
#> Y.10 0.04 0.04
#> Y.01 0.80 0.11
#> Y.11 0.08 0.07

When querying a model you can request use of the posterior distribution with the using argument:

model |>
  query_model(
    query = "Y[X=1] > Y[X=0]",
    using = c("priors", "posteriors")) |>
  kable(digits = 2)
label query given using case_level mean sd cred.low cred.high
Y[X=1] > Y[X=0] Y[X=1] > Y[X=0] - priors FALSE 0.25 0.20 0.01 0.72
Y[X=1] > Y[X=0] Y[X=1] > Y[X=0] - posteriors FALSE 0.80 0.11 0.53 0.95

Summary of stan performance

You can access a summary of the parameter values and convergence information as produced by stan thus:

inspect(model, "stan_summary")
#> 
#> stan_summary
#> Stan model summary:
#> 
#> Inference for Stan model: simplexes.
#> 4 chains, each with iter=2000; warmup=1000; thin=1; 
#> post-warmup draws per chain=1000, total post-warmup draws=4000.
#> 
#>              mean se_mean   sd   2.5%    25%    50%    75%  97.5% n_eff Rhat
#> X.0          0.50    0.00 0.10   0.31   0.43   0.50   0.57   0.69  2184    1
#> X.1          0.50    0.00 0.10   0.31   0.43   0.50   0.57   0.69  2184    1
#> Y.00         0.08    0.00 0.07   0.00   0.02   0.06   0.11   0.27  2186    1
#> Y.10         0.04    0.00 0.04   0.00   0.01   0.03   0.06   0.14  3847    1
#> Y.01         0.80    0.00 0.11   0.53   0.74   0.82   0.88   0.95  3645    1
#> Y.11         0.08    0.00 0.07   0.00   0.02   0.06   0.11   0.28  3956    1
#> X0.Y00       0.04    0.00 0.04   0.00   0.01   0.03   0.06   0.15  2256    1
#> X1.Y00       0.04    0.00 0.04   0.00   0.01   0.03   0.06   0.14  2123    1
#> X0.Y10       0.02    0.00 0.02   0.00   0.01   0.02   0.03   0.08  3690    1
#> X1.Y10       0.02    0.00 0.02   0.00   0.01   0.01   0.03   0.07  3610    1
#> X0.Y01       0.40    0.00 0.10   0.22   0.33   0.40   0.46   0.59  2512    1
#> X1.Y01       0.40    0.00 0.10   0.21   0.33   0.40   0.47   0.59  2409    1
#> X0.Y11       0.04    0.00 0.04   0.00   0.01   0.03   0.06   0.14  3842    1
#> X1.Y11       0.04    0.00 0.04   0.00   0.01   0.03   0.06   0.14  3642    1
#> lp__       -14.60    0.05 1.53 -18.42 -15.39 -14.26 -13.47 -12.66  1080    1
#> 
#> Samples were drawn using NUTS(diag_e) at Tue Dec 17 17:38:07 2024.
#> For each parameter, n_eff is a crude measure of effective sample size,
#> and Rhat is the potential scale reduction factor on split chains (at 
#> convergence, Rhat=1).

This summary provides information on the distribution of parameters as well as convergence diagnostics, summarized in the Rhat column. In the printout above the first six rows show the distribution of the model parameters; the next eight rows show the distribution over transformed parameters, here the causal types. The last row shows the unnormalized log density on Stan’s unconstrained space which, as described in Stan documentation is intended to diagnose sampling efficiency and evaluate approximations.

See stan documentation for further details.

Warnings!

We will pass on a summary of warnings generated by stan when there are indications that updating has not gone well.

The below produces warnings as it is executed. (Here there are few iterations but also it is a difficult model as data is entirely missing on a mediator and the data pattern is consistent with two opposite models: one combining positive effects and one combining negative effects.)

model <-
  make_model("X -> M -> Y; M <-> Y") |>
  update_model(data = data.frame(X = rep(0:1, 10000), Y = rep(0:1, 10000)),
               iter = 500,
               refresh = 0)
#> Warning: The largest R-hat is 1.75, indicating chains have not mixed.
#> Running the chains for more iterations may help. See
#> https://mc-stan.org/misc/warnings.html#r-hat
#> Warning: Bulk Effective Samples Size (ESS) is too low, indicating posterior means and medians may be unreliable.
#> Running the chains for more iterations may help. See
#> https://mc-stan.org/misc/warnings.html#bulk-ess
#> Warning: Tail Effective Samples Size (ESS) is too low, indicating posterior variances and tail quantiles may be unreliable.
#> Running the chains for more iterations may help. See
#> https://mc-stan.org/misc/warnings.html#tail-ess

You can access a summary of these warnings like this:

inspect(model, "stan_warnings")
#> 
#> stan_warnings
#> Stan warnings generated during updating:
#> The largest R-hat is 1.75, indicating chains have not mixed
#> Bulk Effective Samples Size (ESS) is too low
#> Tail Effective Samples Size (ESS) is too low

But we will also remind you about them when you use the print or summary methods:

model
#> 
#> Causal statement: 
#> M -> Y; M <-> Y; X -> M
#> 
#> Number of nodal types by node:
#> X M Y 
#> 2 4 4 
#> 
#> Number of causal types: 32
#> 
#> Model has been updated and contains a posterior distribution with
#> 4 chains, each with iter=500; warmup=250; thin=1;  
#> Use inspect(model, 'stan_objects') to inspect stan summary
#> 
#> Warnings passed from rstan during updating:
#> The largest R-hat is 1.75, indicating chains have not mixed
#> Bulk Effective Samples Size (ESS) is too low
#> Tail Effective Samples Size (ESS) is too low

And also when you query the model:

query_model(model, "X==1", using = "posteriors")
#> Note: warnings passed from rstan during updating:
#> 
#> Model 1 warnings:
#> The largest R-hat is 1.75, indicating chains have not mixed
#> Bulk Effective Samples Size (ESS) is too low
#> Tail Effective Samples Size (ESS) is too low
#> 
#> 
#> Causal queries generated by query_model (all at population level)
#> 
#> |label |using      | mean|    sd| cred.low| cred.high|
#> |:-----|:----------|----:|-----:|--------:|---------:|
#> |X==1  |posteriors |  0.5| 0.004|    0.494|     0.507|
query_model(model, "X==1", using = "posteriors") |> plot()
#> Note: warnings passed from rstan during updating:
#> 
#> Model 1 warnings:
#> The largest R-hat is 1.75, indicating chains have not mixed
#> Bulk Effective Samples Size (ESS) is too low
#> Tail Effective Samples Size (ESS) is too low
Query invokes messages
Query invokes messages

These warnings are not always important but safest to be aware of them if they arise and to investigate further. For more on warnings see stan post on warnings.

Advanced diagnostics

If you are interested in advanced diagnostics of performance you can save and access the raw stan output.

model <- make_model("X -> Y") |>
  update_model(data, keep_fit = TRUE)

Note that the summary for this raw output shows the labels used in the generic stan model: lambda for the vector of parameters, corresponding to the parameters in the parameters dataframe (inspect(model, "parameters_df")), and , if saved, a vector types for the causal types (see inspect(model, "causal_types")) and w for the event probabilities (inspect(model, "prior_event_probabilities")).

model |> inspect("stanfit")
#> 
#> stanfit
#> Stan model summary:
#> Inference for Stan model: simplexes.
#> 4 chains, each with iter=2000; warmup=1000; thin=1; 
#> post-warmup draws per chain=1000, total post-warmup draws=4000.
#> 
#>              mean se_mean   sd   2.5%    25%    50%    75%  97.5% n_eff Rhat
#> lambdas[1]   0.51    0.00 0.10   0.30   0.43   0.50   0.58   0.71  2038    1
#> lambdas[2]   0.49    0.00 0.10   0.29   0.42   0.50   0.57   0.70  2038    1
#> lambdas[3]   0.08    0.00 0.07   0.00   0.03   0.06   0.12   0.28  2075    1
#> lambdas[4]   0.04    0.00 0.04   0.00   0.01   0.03   0.06   0.15  3806    1
#> lambdas[5]   0.80    0.00 0.11   0.53   0.74   0.81   0.88   0.96  4103    1
#> lambdas[6]   0.08    0.00 0.07   0.00   0.03   0.06   0.11   0.28  4415    1
#> types[1]     0.04    0.00 0.04   0.00   0.01   0.03   0.06   0.15  1850    1
#> types[2]     0.04    0.00 0.04   0.00   0.01   0.03   0.06   0.14  2155    1
#> types[3]     0.02    0.00 0.02   0.00   0.01   0.01   0.03   0.08  3769    1
#> types[4]     0.02    0.00 0.02   0.00   0.01   0.01   0.03   0.08  3520    1
#> types[5]     0.40    0.00 0.10   0.21   0.33   0.40   0.47   0.61  2399    1
#> types[6]     0.39    0.00 0.10   0.21   0.32   0.39   0.46   0.59  2480    1
#> types[7]     0.04    0.00 0.04   0.00   0.01   0.03   0.06   0.14  4065    1
#> types[8]     0.04    0.00 0.04   0.00   0.01   0.03   0.06   0.14  4228    1
#> lp__       -14.60    0.05 1.56 -18.42 -15.44 -14.24 -13.43 -12.64  1061    1
#> 
#> Samples were drawn using NUTS(diag_e) at Tue Dec 17 17:38:21 2024.
#> For each parameter, n_eff is a crude measure of effective sample size,
#> and Rhat is the potential scale reduction factor on split chains (at 
#> convergence, Rhat=1).

You can then use diagnostic packages such as bayesplot.

model |> inspect("stanfit") |>
  bayesplot::mcmc_pairs(pars = c("lambdas[3]", "lambdas[4]", "lambdas[5]", "lambdas[6]"))
#> 
#> stanfit
#> Stan model summary:
#> Inference for Stan model: simplexes.
#> 4 chains, each with iter=2000; warmup=1000; thin=1; 
#> post-warmup draws per chain=1000, total post-warmup draws=4000.
#> 
#>              mean se_mean   sd   2.5%    25%    50%    75%  97.5% n_eff Rhat
#> lambdas[1]   0.51    0.00 0.10   0.30   0.43   0.50   0.58   0.71  2038    1
#> lambdas[2]   0.49    0.00 0.10   0.29   0.42   0.50   0.57   0.70  2038    1
#> lambdas[3]   0.08    0.00 0.07   0.00   0.03   0.06   0.12   0.28  2075    1
#> lambdas[4]   0.04    0.00 0.04   0.00   0.01   0.03   0.06   0.15  3806    1
#> lambdas[5]   0.80    0.00 0.11   0.53   0.74   0.81   0.88   0.96  4103    1
#> lambdas[6]   0.08    0.00 0.07   0.00   0.03   0.06   0.11   0.28  4415    1
#> types[1]     0.04    0.00 0.04   0.00   0.01   0.03   0.06   0.15  1850    1
#> types[2]     0.04    0.00 0.04   0.00   0.01   0.03   0.06   0.14  2155    1
#> types[3]     0.02    0.00 0.02   0.00   0.01   0.01   0.03   0.08  3769    1
#> types[4]     0.02    0.00 0.02   0.00   0.01   0.01   0.03   0.08  3520    1
#> types[5]     0.40    0.00 0.10   0.21   0.33   0.40   0.47   0.61  2399    1
#> types[6]     0.39    0.00 0.10   0.21   0.32   0.39   0.46   0.59  2480    1
#> types[7]     0.04    0.00 0.04   0.00   0.01   0.03   0.06   0.14  4065    1
#> types[8]     0.04    0.00 0.04   0.00   0.01   0.03   0.06   0.14  4228    1
#> lp__       -14.60    0.05 1.56 -18.42 -15.44 -14.24 -13.43 -12.64  1061    1
#> 
#> Samples were drawn using NUTS(diag_e) at Tue Dec 17 17:38:21 2024.
#> For each parameter, n_eff is a crude measure of effective sample size,
#> and Rhat is the potential scale reduction factor on split chains (at 
#> convergence, Rhat=1).
Diagnostics
Diagnostics
np <- model |> inspect("stanfit") |> bayesplot::nuts_params()
#> 
#> stanfit
#> Stan model summary:
#> Inference for Stan model: simplexes.
#> 4 chains, each with iter=2000; warmup=1000; thin=1; 
#> post-warmup draws per chain=1000, total post-warmup draws=4000.
#> 
#>              mean se_mean   sd   2.5%    25%    50%    75%  97.5% n_eff Rhat
#> lambdas[1]   0.51    0.00 0.10   0.30   0.43   0.50   0.58   0.71  2038    1
#> lambdas[2]   0.49    0.00 0.10   0.29   0.42   0.50   0.57   0.70  2038    1
#> lambdas[3]   0.08    0.00 0.07   0.00   0.03   0.06   0.12   0.28  2075    1
#> lambdas[4]   0.04    0.00 0.04   0.00   0.01   0.03   0.06   0.15  3806    1
#> lambdas[5]   0.80    0.00 0.11   0.53   0.74   0.81   0.88   0.96  4103    1
#> lambdas[6]   0.08    0.00 0.07   0.00   0.03   0.06   0.11   0.28  4415    1
#> types[1]     0.04    0.00 0.04   0.00   0.01   0.03   0.06   0.15  1850    1
#> types[2]     0.04    0.00 0.04   0.00   0.01   0.03   0.06   0.14  2155    1
#> types[3]     0.02    0.00 0.02   0.00   0.01   0.01   0.03   0.08  3769    1
#> types[4]     0.02    0.00 0.02   0.00   0.01   0.01   0.03   0.08  3520    1
#> types[5]     0.40    0.00 0.10   0.21   0.33   0.40   0.47   0.61  2399    1
#> types[6]     0.39    0.00 0.10   0.21   0.32   0.39   0.46   0.59  2480    1
#> types[7]     0.04    0.00 0.04   0.00   0.01   0.03   0.06   0.14  4065    1
#> types[8]     0.04    0.00 0.04   0.00   0.01   0.03   0.06   0.14  4228    1
#> lp__       -14.60    0.05 1.56 -18.42 -15.44 -14.24 -13.43 -12.64  1061    1
#> 
#> Samples were drawn using NUTS(diag_e) at Tue Dec 17 17:38:21 2024.
#> For each parameter, n_eff is a crude measure of effective sample size,
#> and Rhat is the potential scale reduction factor on split chains (at 
#> convergence, Rhat=1).
head(np) |> kable()
Chain Iteration Parameter Value
1 1 accept_stat__ 0.9761858
1 2 accept_stat__ 0.9923295
1 3 accept_stat__ 0.9462610
1 4 accept_stat__ 0.9934953
1 5 accept_stat__ 0.9442020
1 6 accept_stat__ 0.9972044

model |>
  inspect("stanfit") |>
  bayesplot::mcmc_trace(pars = "lambdas[5]", np = np)
#> 
#> stanfit
#> Stan model summary:
#> Inference for Stan model: simplexes.
#> 4 chains, each with iter=2000; warmup=1000; thin=1; 
#> post-warmup draws per chain=1000, total post-warmup draws=4000.
#> 
#>              mean se_mean   sd   2.5%    25%    50%    75%  97.5% n_eff Rhat
#> lambdas[1]   0.51    0.00 0.10   0.30   0.43   0.50   0.58   0.71  2038    1
#> lambdas[2]   0.49    0.00 0.10   0.29   0.42   0.50   0.57   0.70  2038    1
#> lambdas[3]   0.08    0.00 0.07   0.00   0.03   0.06   0.12   0.28  2075    1
#> lambdas[4]   0.04    0.00 0.04   0.00   0.01   0.03   0.06   0.15  3806    1
#> lambdas[5]   0.80    0.00 0.11   0.53   0.74   0.81   0.88   0.96  4103    1
#> lambdas[6]   0.08    0.00 0.07   0.00   0.03   0.06   0.11   0.28  4415    1
#> types[1]     0.04    0.00 0.04   0.00   0.01   0.03   0.06   0.15  1850    1
#> types[2]     0.04    0.00 0.04   0.00   0.01   0.03   0.06   0.14  2155    1
#> types[3]     0.02    0.00 0.02   0.00   0.01   0.01   0.03   0.08  3769    1
#> types[4]     0.02    0.00 0.02   0.00   0.01   0.01   0.03   0.08  3520    1
#> types[5]     0.40    0.00 0.10   0.21   0.33   0.40   0.47   0.61  2399    1
#> types[6]     0.39    0.00 0.10   0.21   0.32   0.39   0.46   0.59  2480    1
#> types[7]     0.04    0.00 0.04   0.00   0.01   0.03   0.06   0.14  4065    1
#> types[8]     0.04    0.00 0.04   0.00   0.01   0.03   0.06   0.14  4228    1
#> lp__       -14.60    0.05 1.56 -18.42 -15.44 -14.24 -13.43 -12.64  1061    1
#> 
#> Samples were drawn using NUTS(diag_e) at Tue Dec 17 17:38:21 2024.
#> For each parameter, n_eff is a crude measure of effective sample size,
#> and Rhat is the potential scale reduction factor on split chains (at 
#> convergence, Rhat=1).
#> No divergences to plot.
More diagnostics
More diagnostics